Rigged in India
october 1, 2004 was a watershed for India. On that day, countrywide, a new set of emission norms for in-use vehicles came into existence. Putting it mildly, they were well thought out. For it took the executive over a decade to change the in-use emission norms, since inception.
The norms were made stricter for the petrol vehicles, but for our diesel vehicles, expectedly, though the emission norms were left unchanged, the tests procedures were made more stringent. The idea was to make the diesel tests more representative of the actual conditions. Right?
It took just one visit to show how wrong we were. Despite pollution checking instruments having embedded software, they are not beyond the inventiveness of our checking centres. The result: the system takes a beating, even today. The question is: what would it take to actually implement environmental norms in this country?
For a change, these new norms were put in place without the court's directive. Quite a change in itself, given that environmental issues seem a judicial prerogative, with the executive rendered a mere bystander. Fact is the executive has simply failed to deliver, giving the stock pretext, "let hard decisions be taken by court.' This serves its own purpose: votes are not lost as long as we can get the judiciary to endorse it. Accordingly, senior bureaucrats typically reflect the "if you could push this through the court' attitude.
While many vital decisions have been pushed through by the judiciary's intervention, in the long run, this is hardly the ideal situation. The constitution of India had created clear
Related Content
- The inequality virus: Bringing together a world torn apart by coronavirus through a fair, just and sustainable economy
- Green energy plan for offshore platforms
- 5 iconic photos of BP oil spill
- Not oil tankers, oil rigs behind tar ball menace: Coast Guard
- Goa mining firms rigged environment reports: Expert
- Ads nail city’s greens