Low exposure, high risk
threshold levels of exposure to environmental risks are crucial for regulatory agencies to determine safe limits for harmful contaminants. Though any level of exposure to carcinogens is harmful and regulatory agencies use linear dose-response models to estimate the risk to human health, they usually assume threshold levels exist for non-carcinogens. But recently, two scientists have found no apparent threshold for health risks even with non-carcinogens, and, in some cases, higher risks per unit of exposure dose at low levels (Public Library of Science (Medicine), Vol 2, No 12, December, 2005).
Donald T Wigle from the Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Canada, and Bruce P Lanphear from the Cincinnati Children's Environmental Health Center, Ohio, the us , studied dose-response relationships over exposure ranges far below those generally used in animal studies for four of the most widespread and extensively studied environmental hazards
Related Content
- Judgment of the National Green Tribunal regarding steps to be taken to protect people from the hazards of asbestos, 17/07/2023
- Efficiency and equity in urban flood management policies: a systematic urban economics exploration
- Impact of climate change on sovereign risk in Asia
- Children's climate risk index: Egypt report
- Different air under one sky: the inequity of air pollution
- When the dust settles: a review of the health implications of the dust component of air pollution