downtoearth-subscribe

Reddy remedies

  • 14/08/2003

Setting standards
BIS should have a core group of scientists from various fields to keep track of recent scientific and technical developments in critical areas.

For the sake of transparency, the constitution of the various committees, panels or such bodies involved in standards formulation should be on the web.

It is sometimes stated that vested interests, particularly big industry, influence BIS' activity. This criticism emanates from the fact that standard formulation is a voluntary activity and BIS does not pay anything for participation in meetings of the technical committees. At times the participation of scientific organisations and consumer organisations remains on paper, while industry participates more actively.

Implementing standards
Enforcement of BIS Act is weak. Search and seizure operations are carried out on the basis of specific complaints. Prosecution does not reach its logical conclusion for several years.

BIS should review its internal resources before accepting further responsibility. But once it accepts the responsibility, it must discharge it faithfully and not cite lack of human resources as justification for non-adherence to norms.

BIS must revitalise its core competencies. Existing procedures, formulated several years ago, are shrouded in secrecy and confidentiality. These may be reviewed by expert groups, to achieve maximum transparency.

Pesticide policy
Need to review permissible limits of contaminants in other food products under PFA. This may also lead to a wider discussion regarding permissible levels of use of pesticides and fertilisers for agriculture and horticulture.

Drinking water policy
In developed countries all water for human consumption

  • Tags:

Related Content